Is Hashable the next Quora?

On February 25, 2011, in Thoughts on Social Media, by tgoodridge

Two months ago, Quora was all the rage. For those of you who don’t have a clue what Quora is,  think some sort of combination of Linkedin, Wikipedia, Yahoo Answers and in some cases, honestly.com.  Or in their words…

“Quora is a continually improving collection of questions and answers created, edited, and organized by everyone who uses it.”

I dabbled in it for a while, and actively followed David Armano’s (SVP at Edelman) updates and answers. He was great at it. But it seems as if is updates (and others) have slowed down a bit. Not sure why. There’s been some mixed reaction to is so far from other people in the social media space. Here are some good examples…

Now, as we gear up for SXSW in just a few short weeks, we’re hearing lots of buzz about Hashable. Hashable is an app and web-based platform that basically facilitates real-life introductions. Let’s say you met them at a conference and don’t have time to exchange business cards- it simply lets you do that through twitter and/or Facebook. It also helps you make virtual introductions through email, checking in at the same event (good call for SXSW) and creating your “inner circle”- your power users.

At first glance, it looks pretty good.  But like Quora, the user interface can be confusing. I’m not sure what the leaderboard and “hashcred” means, but hey, I’m gonna give this a try at SXSW and see what happens. I think we (and Hashable) will have some pretty quick feedback in the next few weeks.

But, what worries me about Hashable and Quora is that they’re simply piggybacking off of existing behaviors and technologies (think Twitter, Facebook Foursquare and Linkedin) and trying to make a a go of it.

For Quora users, what happens when Facebook Questions comes along in a few weeks- then what?

For Hashable, can’t LinkedIn just beef up it’s mobile app, add some Foursquare functionality and replace you?

And for lots of us in the social media space aren’t we  simply getting tired of the next “shiny object”?

What do you think? You going to use Hashable at SXSW? Do you love Quora? Are they both worth oodles of money?

PrintFriendly
 

“How to Eat People” is Andy Kessler’s new book about game changing rules for entrepreneurs and us marketing types. It’s a fascinating book on how technology is taking away jobs, and what you can and should do about it.

His Rule #7 “Be Soylent- Eat People” has a simple premise. We must eliminate worthless jobs. Have more “creators” and less “servers”.  Read on.

Creators: The people writing code,  plowing our land, publishing content, creating new drugs, creating new search engines, a better refrigerator… you get the picture…

Servers: Everyone else. He’s created some fun nicknames here, and they are remarkably accurate…

  • Sloppers: the people who move things from one place to another, think factory workers, DMV employees, toll-booth takers
  • Sponges- Those who passed a certain test to prove their mettle (or to limit supply). Doctors, Laywers, Real Estate Brokers, stock brokers, etc.
  • SuperSloppers – Um, that’s us marketing types. At least some of us. The people or products who convince you that you should buy that Rolex, Prius, and yes, even organic food
  • Slimers- yep- you guessed it. People who work in finance or Wall Street. They don’t create any real value, they just keep the financial engines churning
  • Thieves- Think goverment and big companies. Cable operators, cell phone companies, regulatory inspectors and more.

So, what does this mean? Well, for one thing, it explains why more and more people and companies need to create, rather than to serve.  His argument? More and more of those “servers” are simply being replaced by technology.  There is a reason why Apple, Netflix and Google are flourishing, and the media and retailers are not. There’s an obvious reason why next year the Golden Gate bridge won’t have any toll-booth takers…. Technology.

So, the real take away for us as Marketers and Social Media types is that Kessler’s book verifies what we’ve been saying all along. Content creation is it. CC Chapman and Ann Handley just wrote a great book about it, if you haven’t already read it, put it on your list.

So, marketers, let’s stop serving and start creating…

PrintFriendly
 

So, it’s been about a week since the launch of Murdoch’s Daily- an iPad-only (for now) paid application for news and original content. In their words, “Daily is a category first: a tablet-native national news brand built from the ground up to publish original content exclusively for the iPad.”

It follows on the footsteps, and some success, of Flipboard- another iPad application built for consuming content. FlipBoard and the Daily both use the iPad to present content in a visually stunning way.  But FlipBoard simply repurposes the content, the Daily creates it’s OWN content – a risky step for the publishing industry, already on shaky ground. We’ve all heard about declining circulations in newspapers, and publishers trying to figure out how to make money as more content moves online.

Well, here’s why I like it.

  • Someone has to have the guts to try something new in the fast- changing publishing environment. The world is being turned upside down by this new media thing, and if anyone is gonna make a run at it, it should be a guy with deep pockets and plenty of resources. If he screws up, so what? We’ll learn what worked, make tweaks and move on.
  • It’s fresh, but polished and credible. It’s sort of a cross between Twitter and the NYTimes.  If breaking news happens- we’ll get the fresh news online somewhere (Twitter?)  then read an in-depth article about it the following day. Twitter=fresh but not necessarily accurate. NYT- still have to go through the long editorial/publishing process. The Daily is somewhere in between. The recent breaking news in Egypt is a perfect example of how The Daily was able to quickly adapt to changing stories…
  • Interactive. This is an obvious one. (check out the video below to see it in action). You get everything in a nice tidy package. Well written articles, video, polls, social sharing, ability to leave “voice” comments and more. And, the ads didn’t feel like ads. If I liked them I clicked on them (some with video). If not, just a swipe to ignore and keep reading.
  • Local customization: It obviously knows that I’m from Boston, and naturally picked my weather forecast and sports teams so I could get custom news  (and tweets) which mattered to me. Too bad I’m not a Boston-sports fan… :-)
  • It’s short and sweet. Let’s face it, our attention spans continue to decline. This content is written for that commute on the train, something to quickly read on the couch, or, my favorite, something to read before I go to bed.

Video below will give you a feel for what I’m talking about. What do you think? Have you tried it? Would you try it?Worth it?

PrintFriendly
Tagged with: